User talk:1000rarepepes

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vine snake has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vine snake was changed by 1000rarepepes (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971839 on 2015-05-27T02:41:25+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vine snake. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Flyer22 (talk) 02:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vine snake, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T&middot;E&middot;C) 02:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Train. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Train was changed by 1000rarepepes (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.979122 on 2015-05-27T03:02:17+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * To be clear, adding complimentary closes like "Thanks for reading!" to articles is disruptive. —C.Fred (talk) 03:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)