User talk:101.165.51.106

March 2020
Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chris Chibnall have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 23:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Chibnall. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 23:39, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Special:Contributions/KylieTastic|KylieTastic

 * Look into revoking rollback privileges of user:KylieTastic for improper censorship and suppression of encyclopedic information supported by fact [Elevated] 101.165.51.106 (talk) 00:10, 6 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Look into revoking privileges of user:jpgordon for improper reason citing "See WP:NPOV. --jpgordon' [Elevated] ~ reason=jpgordon does not give a valid reason for declining unauthorized block. Neutral point of view is supported by third party factual information from sites such as Rotten Tomatoes which reported low audience scores.


 * Look into revoking privileges of user:Yamla for threatening a wikipedia user, citation: "This IP address is not directly blocked. However, it certainly will be if you continue making blatantly inappropriate edits", using insults, citation: "you manifestly lack sufficient competence to edit here" and failing to provide sufficient reason to denying unblock request. WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:CITE all apply. Should there be continued false flags of "vandalism" by insubordinate admin/moderators in an attempt to stifle the truth on Chris Chibnall's wikipedia page, drastic measures may apply subject to certain terms and conditions.

101.165.51.106 (talk) 22:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

admin.remedy
My answer: This is disgraceful. If you think the Wikipedia can be a place that omits, falsifies, suppresses or otherwise distort the truth especially when you have multiple, many, many people all making the same edits that should tell you something and that is, that you are alone. You and those who continue to abuse the privilege powers are alone. This will most likely continue, it starts with a dozen people, then hundreds of people, then thousands of people, tens of thousands of people all making the edits to show the facts presented. Will you try to block tens of thousands of people? You are alone. You can threaten me all you want with ["...directly blocked. However it certainly will be if you continue making blatantly inappropriate edits"] You and your petty admins 'likely need to account for your actions so far'. You lack sufficient competence to block the truth. 101.165.51.106 (talk) 03:07, 7 March 2020 (UTC)