User talk:101.166.152.208

Help me! - COI & level of detail
I have sought to add information to a Wikipedia entry (Jack Wong Sue) - the information I added has been removed on the following grounds. "...this level of detail is clearly inappropriate and should not be added in this manner particularly by an editor with a conflict of interest"

The level of detail is consistent with publicly available records and is an extract from a newspaper (Three W.A. Drivers Die In (separate) Accidents - The West Australian Monday, September 15, 1958. Page 2) and the findings of a coroners inquest held on 5 December 1958 (." CORONIAL INQUEST Findings 122/58 of 470/58 (Coroner's Court of Western Australia) ). Suffice to say I have transcribed the relevant facts from each of these publicly available sources. There is no more or less than these these two public sources provide. The information which I am adding to the entry is about Jack Wong Sue members of his family and does mention a family member of mine - my mother deceased 1958 - I don't understand how she could add this information to the entry and nor do i understand why it is appropriate for me to do so. The information is merely the facts as reported and as recorded in official records no more no less.

I am unclear what is meant by "should not be added in this manner" what manner is that ?

John Reeves Taylor (talk) 00:46, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging, the editor who reverted your edit for their views. In my opinion, your edit was inappropriate, for the same reason as gave - it gives undue weight, placing too much emphasis on an accident when the article should be about the person as a whole. AustralianRupert has cut down the level of detail, summarizing it into one sentence which is more appropriate, in my opinion. As someone who has been personally affected by the incident, you should also avoid editing the article directly, since you have a conflict of interest that makes it difficult to write neutrally about the person or incident. Instead, you should make an edit request on the talk page of the article. Thanks. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 02:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * G'day, Daryl and John. Thanks for the ping. Echo what Daryl is saying here. If you feel more information should be added to the Jack Wong Sue article, I would encourage you to outline your proposed additions to the article's talk page, which can be found here: Talk:Jack Wong Sue, rather than editing the page directly. You can then see if there is consensus for your proposal among other editors, who can then make the agreed changes (if any), while allowing you to avoid issues with your conflict of interest. It is important to remember, though, that we need to maintain balance in the article and it shouldn't focus too much on one aspect of the subject's life. Further, can I please ask that you use your own user talk page, rather than some random IP talk page, to ask for help in the future? Your talk page is here: User talk:John Reeves Taylor. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 03:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

I do not understand this response --John Reeves Taylor (talk) 04:45, 12 December 2017 (UTC)