User talk:101.178.161.1

August 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Web search engine has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Web search engine was changed by 101.178.161.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889889 on 2014-08-27T04:09:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:09, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Virgin Atlantic, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:39, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Immigration to Yemen
Your two links you added to Immigration to Yemen are bad. As I couldn't verify your entry, I removed them. Please repair the links before replacing the text. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 04:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Immigration to Yemen. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 05:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Immigration to Yemen. Jim1138 (talk) 05:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Jeb Bush, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Haruth (talk) 00:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Myuran Sukumaran etc
Re: ".. is it confirmed that he is executed or are the recent reports just rumours."

Yes, Myuran Sukumaran and Andrew Chan were executed overnight. It's all over the news in Australia, where you are apparently located. 220  of  Borg 04:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, I am located here, but just wanted to be sure that's all. I just haven't seen any video news footage yet. You know, people like to make rumours sometimes. Thanks for that.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for evading a current block on. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. DrKiernan (talk) 06:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Hi 101.178.161.1, I've reverted your repeated addition to Mawson Lakes, South Australia, not only because it was unsourced, but also because it was so vague and lacking in detail as to be completely uninformative. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 06:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

June 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Latin American Australians. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. '' If you have an argument for the hatnote, take it to the article's talk page and explain why it is not WP:OFFTOPIC. Do not keep reverting and adding a hatnote you don't even know how to format. The place to discuss content is the article talk page, not in a churlish edit summary.'' Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Latin American Australians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at Hyde Park, South Australia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TJH2018 talk  02:42, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Keep it to yourself. You think that others can harras me and thats okay?