User talk:101.78.81.65

August 2023
Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, United States sanctions, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender &#124;(formerly HMSSolent )&#124; lambast 03:19, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at United States sanctions, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. lavender &#124;(formerly HMSSolent )&#124; lambast 03:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi 101.78.81.65! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of United States sanctions several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Note that manual reverts and re-addition of material still count as reverts.. Oblivy (talk) 14:14, 5 August 2023 (UTC)