User talk:1010Art

Welcome!
Hello, 1010Art, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:1010Art/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Schminnte (talk • contribs) 15:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:1010Art/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:1010Art/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 15:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Gamrath (July 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jason Gamrath and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Jason_Gamrath Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jason_Gamrath reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Gamrath (July 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by UtherSRG were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jason Gamrath and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Jason_Gamrath Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:UtherSRG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jason_Gamrath reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 11:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jason Gamrath has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jason Gamrath. Thanks! UtherSRG (talk) 11:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Gamrath (July 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jason Gamrath and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Jason_Gamrath Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jason_Gamrath reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Gamrath (July 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by UtherSRG were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jason Gamrath and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Jason_Gamrath Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:UtherSRG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jason_Gamrath reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Gamrath (July 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by UtherSRG were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jason Gamrath and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Jason_Gamrath Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:UtherSRG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jason_Gamrath reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 14:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. UtherSRG (talk) 14:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Since you have refused to listen to the advice given to you on what you need to fix, I'm giving you a short time-out. Use this time to read and comprehend all of the policies and advice we've given you. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Jason Gamrath, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 09:29, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


 * "It may require cleanup"? 1010Art (talk) 15:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The implication is plainly that a paid contribution requires cleanup and is less professional, whereas an unpaid one doesn't. That's not true. 1010Art (talk) 15:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * It is just the standard template added to paid for articles and to be clear MOST paid for articles need a LOT of clean up. Theroadislong (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I know. But it's entirely inappropriate to have such a huge box like this, if there should even be a box at all (see bio). Plus, how many articles about living artists have at least some contributions that are paid? Probably almost all of them. 1010Art (talk) 17:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If you know of any artists articles with undisclosed paid editing then we can tag those too. Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The box is not huge. And given that Theroadislong has over 226k edits, and I have a bit over half of that, I think they and I know quite a bit more about what is appropriate than you do, with less than 50 edits. When we are telling you something, please do try to understand what we are saying, that we are coming from a place of consistency, and a deep knowledge of what helps to improve the encyclopedia and what doesn't. As for the number of artist biography articles, we have about 1000 on Category:20th-century American artists that haven't been sorted into other more refined categories, and about 7k more that have been sorted into men- and women-specific categories. Let's say some of those 1000 have been double sorted and keep with the 7k rough number. The vast majority of them have absolutely no content that was written by a paid editor, but quite a good percentage have some form of tag about how the article can be improved. Your WP:WHATABOUT argument is both invalid as a form, and on the underlying data. And as Theroadislong just said - if you see articles that have paid editing, they should get tagged as well. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:27, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

malignant editors

 * You are hilariously and obviously incorrect. An editor with special privileges ignoring the current references, suggesting to add new references, and suggesting to read an article that I am very familiar with, and then blocking me for adding the references they suggested is the very definition of malignant. What a joke Wikipedia is now User:331dot.1010Art (talk) 23:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, 1010Art,
 * This is a very brief block, probably given to get your attention so you don't ignore the advice you've been given by administrators or other editors. But if you don't drop the attitude that you are being persecuted, you could easily be blocked indefinitely. Is that what you want? If you want to return to working on your article, then think about the advice you've been given, how you could act differently, sit out for a few more hours and then get back to becoming a better editor. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * it seems to be difficult for everyone who has replied so far to grasp a very basic concept, which is that any "advice" that was given was followed, with a resulting block. There's nothing left to actually follow. I added new references like they asked but was blocked. Not persecuted, no. You simply refuse to understand the situation.1010Art (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

So...

 * You left a comment on the draft talk page and others have responded there, it appears that you have not read any of the advice you have been given and still do not understand how Wikipedia works, you are being paid to edit here, whilst we are all volunteers, whilst paid editors are tolerated here, if they become a time sink then patience runs out. Theroadislong (talk) 15:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * And then you responded on separate sections in the Talk page, not really responding to me. Just responding wherever. Love the attacks though on what you think I know. --1010Art (talk) 16:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Reviewers leave comments on the draft page, but any discussion about the comments belongs on the talk page. Theroadislong (talk) 17:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jason Gamrath
Hello, 1010Art. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jason Gamrath, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jason Gamrath


Hello, 1010Art. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jason Gamrath".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)