User talk:102.190.137.243

September 2022
Hello, I'm McSly. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McSly (talk) 16:48, 3 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * I appreciate the diversity. Given there were sources, from legit articles, recognized as globally credible, I would appreciate understanding what was 'less than neutral'.
 * Thanks 102.190.137.243 (talk) 16:51, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello. For 1 thing, you seem to use sources linking to conspiracy theories (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program) like it they were true. --McSly (talk) 17:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Science.org is a CONSPIRACY reference :))
 * India's Economic Times?
 * And Wiki's OWN "Starfish Prime" entry??
 * If it 'seems' they are linked to conspiracy theories, perhaps you may read these articles, and check out their sites, since it is something which comes across to YOU as conspiracy, rather than verify it IS conspiracy.
 * Because it would be easy for me to say it 'seems' you are writing an encyclopedia from a very biased view, meant to proliferate an agenda that hammers on certain ideas, while completely lacking any real sense of objectivity that any encyclopedia is to maintain as a REFERENCED source which students/public at large supposedly use to back up their own works.
 * But it only SEEMS like that's where you are coming from.
 * Which is why I can't claim it is, or actually write a
 * Wiki entry about how I interpret you.
 * Anyhow. Rock on & good luck with that. 102.190.137.243 (talk) 05:08, 4 September 2022 (UTC)