User talk:103.210.146.96

August 2022
Hello, I'm BilCat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Motorola Mobility have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 01:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dove (toiletries). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  01:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lenovo, you may be blocked from editing. GA-RT-22 (talk) 01:00, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at JBL.  General Ization Talk  04:34, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. See my section below, for details.[] Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk)

Please stop removing/changing info to make companies look more American
You have been removing or changing information regarding companies to either hide their international character (as you did by removing the Munich location of the corporate owner from the article on PIMCO []) or by changing companies to state they're headquartered in the US (as you did in the article for Bacardi []). These are not the only examples of this that I've found while just looking through a couple of days of your edits; there are more. Please stop doing this. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 20:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)


 * On the article for A123 Systems, you changed the corporate HQ from China to the US [], even though the reference you were using *states* that the global HQ is in China and the US sites are research and testing centers. I don't know why you are doing this, but it appears to be vandalism.  Please stop making these changes.  Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 20:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Found more of these:
 * You changed the HQ for GE Renewable Energy from Paris, France to Paris and Schenectady, NY even though the article already had a reference from 2018 stating that the HQ had moved to Paris. []
 * You removed the fact that Stellantis is a Dutch-domiciled company from the Chrysler article. []
 * You removed the fact that Singtel is Singaporean from the article for Trustwave Holdings. You also removed a word, leaving behind only one letter, for some reason. []
 * You removed the fact that JBL's corporate owner is owned by Samsung. []
 * You removed that fact that Just Eat Takeaway is Dutch from the article for Grubhub. []
 * In the article for Capgemini, you state the company is French-American, and gave a reference that didn't support that at all. []
 * At this point, I'm not going to list any more of these, even though there ARE more such problems in your edit history. You need to stop doing this.  All edits that change or delete facts require a reputable and verifiable reference to back them up. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk)


 * I've reverted some of their changes in other articles, but their change to Chrysler was correct. See Stellantis is a Franco-Italian-American group. BilCat (talk) 21:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, which makes it a Dutch-domiciled company. That text is what this IP editor removed from the article, so their edit was incorrect. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 00:32, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * It's still a multinational corporation, and described as such in the parent article. So their edit was not incorrect, and is more clear and accurate. BilCat (talk) 00:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * By "incorrect" I mean "the editor wasn't doing it to make the article more clear". I've gone through all of this IP editor's edits, and over 80% of them were literally just removing the nationality of corporations, either changing them to some flavor of American or removing the nationality entirely. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 00:55, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * OK, I understand. I was just explaining why I reverted back. BilCat (talk) 01:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Also this edit at Lenovo:, which was done after two prior warnings and the discussion above. There are five citations here supporting "Chinese". I have added a level 3 warning above. GA-RT-22 (talk) 01:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Comment
Hi. Regarding this. I suspect that perhaps you may be right. But you need to cite third-party secondary sources to begin with (other possible considerations notwithstanding) rather than a government view (of one of the parties, no less, with non-neutral embellishing language). Other considerations could include focusing on the volume (or the scope) or possible asymmetries rather than on "friendliness". I think that proper sources may be found, if you want to make an effort and bump this. Asqueladd (talk) 16:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Yet more corporate editing, and likely vandalism
More problems from you: I can't tell if you're a subtle vandal or you're failing to do even the most basic of research before making changes. The fact that you are going back and edit warring after people revert your changes and give you the reasons why they are reverting you, makes me think that you're more likely to be a vandal. Also, the admin ToBeFree reverted an edit that is remarkably similar to the ones you have been making (the "tax inversion" that you keep going on about), with ToBeFree reverting with the description "Block evasion: 5.178.202.10".[] You went in and did THE SAME EDIT a few days ago with this IP address[] as that block evading IP address did in June. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 07:16, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You removed text from Trustwave Holdings that is on the company's own webpage, and also removed that they're a subsidiary of a non-American company.
 * You changed the nationality of Capgemini, saying that a reference substantiated your change when the reference didn't.
 * You removed the fact that Harman Kardon is a subsidiary of Samsung.
 * You changed one of the the competitors of GSK plc from the German Merck Group to the American Merck & Co, stating that the German group isn't a pharmaceutical company when it is one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world and that fact is in the Merck Group article.
 * You said that not all of the three companies that own Lexmark are Chinese, when I took only a few minutes of research to determine that they in fact are all Chinese; I document this in the Lexmark talk page.
 * You've changed Nestlé Purina PetCare twice to say that it's an independent company when the references that I can find don't say that.
 * Probably the most egregious of your edits: You changed BC Partners to say it was an American-British company when the company's own web page says in very very large letters that it's a British company, and in fact spells out that it's regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority, it is incorporated in England and Wales, it is registered at Companies House and the Companies House ID number is given.

August 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.