User talk:103.217.166.154

Gençlerbirliği S.K.
entirely unconstructive edit Hello, I'm Quisqualis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.--Quisqualis (talk) 21:16, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Physiological effects are covered by WP:MEDRS, and other matters
Hi, you have both insisted you are correct, and failed to read the MEDRS policy. I could certainly template you with a warning notice at this point, but I think it may be best if we discuss the matter.

Also, you should not have reinstated the edit without discussion, especially as the source had been challenged - the procedure is BOLD (you) - REVERT (me) - DISCUSS, which you failed to do, instead resorting to edit-warring which is certainly inappropriate on a serious Yoga article.

Now, WP:MEDRS makes it clear that any claim about physical effects on the human body is covered. The assertion that a drop in temperature was measured requires a proper medical source, which means a systematic review article that evaluates the quality of the evidence from multiple experiments. No such source was provided.

On another matter, the Kundalini article was very poorly cited, with low-quality sources or wholly uncited material. It is completely in order for any editor to remove such material, and such sources. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2021 (UTC)