User talk:103.246.39.31

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! SunDawn (talk) 01:10, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Oh hi! I noticed, some one has deleted the whole section on one of the pages.103.246.39.31 (talk) 01:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States Marshals Service. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - wolf  02:08, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

response
You start with yourself103.246.39.31 (talk) 02:09, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * "Start"... what? Are you referring to my edit summary from my last revert? It stated; "". Now, as I write this, I see you have reverted again, so you clearly did not even read the summary, nevermind the policies & guidelines it contains. I've read them already. You need to. You are violating several project rules right now. If you really believe that entry belongs in the article, then you need to about it the correct way. - wolf  02:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * You read them but they went over your head. And anyway sources are not really needed for this section as many other movies do not have a source.103.246.39.31 (talk) 02:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The point was that you haven't read those rules. And now you're resorting to personal attacks, which violates another rule, WP:NPA. If you had read those rules, you would not have continued edit warring to 4RR. It would be best if you self-reverted immediately. If it was another editor, I would also suggest you apologize. Then take the time to read and understand all the policies & guidelines I've pointed out for you. They are all relevant here. From there, you should start a discussion on the article talk page explaining why you feel that entry should be included. Then try to gain a consensus in support of inclusion. Or, you could try finding some secondary sources that clearly show how that entry is worthy of inclusion. Though doing both ways would be better. Also, stop the hostility, rudeness and insults. Comment on EDITSEDITORS. You need to learn to engage in a more collegial manner. - wolf  03:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If anyone needs to apologize, that's you thanks. You are rude and insulting too. You refuse to read the rules and understand that a source is also not needed.103.246.39.31 (talk) 03:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * You can't just parrot all my posts back at me, with the odd insult added in, and call that 'discussing'. I have not been "rude" to you, nor have I "insulted" you. I suggest you provide direct quotes with diffs, to prove these accusations, or strike them and apologize. If you've read wp:npa, you'd know that posting false accusations is considered a personal attack. Such behavior can lead to your access being WP:BLOCKED. Also, with your last revert, you violated 4RR, as clearly shown in the ANEW report. That can also lead to your access being WP:BLOCKED. I will again suggest that you immediately self-revert, and perhaps strike your accusations. It may help you avoid sanctions. I know you believe you're right, but you still need to go about this the right way, like everybody else. You do understand that, yes? If you have any questions, and can be polite about it, feel free to ask. - wolf  03:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - wolf  02:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring at United States Marshals Service
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a complaint at the noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 14:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

USMS pop culture section
If/when you return, you'll note that another editor has since removed the entry that you repeatedly added. I had previously stated that the film has "no significance in pop culture" (wrt to the USMS), but I will go further than that; in The Hunted (2003 film), there is no USMS character in the film, the USMS isn't even mentioned, therefore it has no place on that list. (Making it highly unlikely to find reliable sources or consensus to support inclusion). If you try adding it again, it will be treated as vandalism, (as opposed to a content dispute) and removed. If you try to repeatedly add it again, it will be repeatedly removed, and you will be reported and most likely blocked again. It would be best to just move on to something else. - wolf  17:14, 12 April 2021 (UTC)