User talk:103.246.39.61

September 2022
Hi 103.246.39.61! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 13:19, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Daily Mail as a source
Hello and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. In this edit, you provided a citation to the Daily Mail. However, per community consensus, the newsletter has been deprecated from being cited in articles due to its unreliability and tabloid-style journalism. Per the Biographies of living persons policy, such sources should never be used in biographical articles. Thank you lol1 VNIO  ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 12:23, 24 September 2022 (UTC)