User talk:103.249.239.53

Help me!
Hello sir/madam Please help me with... i added a Destruction and desecration section in Maratha Empire with references/sources, i edited leader's titles in Maratha Empire with strong source because Chhatrapati is not a mean Emperor, Chhatrapati is a Sanskrit word, Emperor called in Sanskrit 'Samrat' not a Chhatrapati, ‘Chhatrapati’ is a Sanskrit language compound word (tatpurusha in Sanskrit) of chhatra (parasol or umbrella) and pati (master/lord/ruler) you can it Chhatrapati and i edited Peshwa title because The word Peshwa is from Persian پیشوا pēshwā, meaning "foremost, leader" a persian language word not a mean 'prime minister', prime minister called 'nakhost vazir' in Persian language, But a user remove it without any message and i edited again but she removed again and again check her page user: Packer&Tracker You can check my sources/references which i provided in Maratha Empire. Please take any action on her.

103.249.239.53 (talk) 09:06, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Since I got a ping and some real bad faith accusations, I am inclined to explain my part.


 * (1) Firstly regarding your emperor part and alleged use of Peshwa from Persian annals, you did not cite any source for it but just added your own synthesis and personal analysis like you are doing here - see WP:SYNT and WP:OR


 * (2) Next regarding your addition of destruction and desecration part - beside the fact that you copied and pasted it from Maratha invasions of Bengal without any attribution, just to let you know copying within Wikipedia requires attribution as well - see WP:CWW.


 * (3) Even leaving copyright issues aside for a moment, you very clearly inserted this section as a revenge for not removing wholesale content on Delhi Sultanate article as it does not fits into your pov - Special:MobileDiff/1112238044. You apparently don't understand what desecration means, do you ? It's defintately associated with vandalizing religious sites of your enemies which Turks were notorious for and frankly the Delhi Sultanate article watered down it very much by citing vague destruction of temples by Hindu, Buddhist rulers to compensate the iconoclasm of Muslims. (I am looking forward to add Professor Andre Wink thesis which counters this to make it more neutral)


 * (4) Maratha catastrophic raids in Bengal as barbaric as they were, make no mistake about it - that was still more like one military campaign or series of raids where they sacked cities and masscared populaces, it still is not on par with the vandalism of Delhi Sultans which spread across during there 300 odd years of rule and from where you are drawing false equivalence with. My advice to you would be to initiate a discussion on talk pages (wherever the addition might cause backclash) discuss with more involved editors there.


 * (5) At last, don't make accusations like this that I didn't left a message on your t/p as a matter of fact did it every time reverting you and that too in a very soft manner for both copyright violation and edit warring - Special:MobileDiff/1112994289 & Special:MobileDiff/1112643771 unlike you Special:MobileDiff/1113017799 - didn't restored to verbals either.

I request you again to rephrase the desecration part in your own words with more app. headings instead of copy-paste from other articles and drawing false equivalence with Delhi Sultanate article. Your current approach, unfortunately might soon take you to WP:ANI which I don't want personally with any newbies.

PS:- You rather should edit with a account instead of dynamic IP ranges for such contentious issues and to further ease the communications, Thanks. ∆ P&#38;t ♀√ (talk) 11:38, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


 * i request too to you, now you can read which i edited and i added attribution about Maratha Invasions of Bengal and inserted images about temple which destoryed in 1791 by marathas, and Chhatrapati is not a mean Emperor, Chhatrapati is a Sanskrit word, Emperor called in Sanskrit 'Samrat' not a Chhatrapati, ‘Chhatrapati’ is a Sanskrit language compound word (tatpurusha in Sanskrit) of chhatra (parasol or umbrella) and pati (master/lord/ruler). so what i do wrong. you can check Chhatrapati is not any equivalent to Emperor, so what i do wrong, check source of Chhatrapati page. Click this link > source 103.249.239.53 (talk) 13:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

In answer to your admin help request: this is a content dispute, and should be discussed at Talk:Maratha Empire. No admin assistance is needed here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DatGuyTalkContribs 17:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Hello sir,
 * I agree with you but there is someone else who wants to put what they want on. I am talking about Packer&Tracker which gives wrong information In the template's leaders' title as 'Chhatrapati' mean [Emperor]  And the 'Peshwa' mean [Prime Minister] in Maratha Empire page, its fake but has no source about the Chhatrapati mean.... and You say I'm editing war with editors, but don't know why, because editor gives wrong info about leader's titles, later i fixed it and i added a section 'Destruction' regarding in page with strong source, refrences and with attribution, In this you are saying editor's disgree with content who i added, I have not done anything wrong you can see, i have put content with facts. Do you want wikipedia to be called as Whatsapp University? and Do you want people to put what they want on Wikipedia without source?
 * If I have said too much or i have mistake then forgive me.
 * Thank You. 103.249.239.53 (talk) 11:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC)