User talk:103.46.220.86

Your edits at Tanya Monro
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I have reverted your edits at Tanya Monro for the following reasons:

I notice you made a number of edits to this article. If my reversion has undone constructive edits to this article, please feel free to re-add them. Adam Black t &bull;  c 04:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You removed references with dead links, and associated content, but these sources have been archived at the Internet Archive. I have added the archive links to the article.
 * You removed a reference and the associated content as the article didn't exist, but the URL was wrong. I have added the correct URL.


 * Before restoring your claim that Tanya Monro has only been named on 275 papers again, please check the reference given in the article: It lists 480 papers. Do not change referenced content without providing a valid source (just naming a source in an edit summary is not sufficient, a valid in-line citation should be given). I see no problem with the ORCiD reference, however.  Adam Black  t &bull;  c 07:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The source you are trying to introduce is not reliable. Scolia is hosted on toolforge and uses data from Wikidata. Wikidata is, similar to Wikipedia, an open platform to which anyone can contribute. Information derived from Wikidata cannot be considered reliable. Adam Black  t &bull;  c 10:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The ORCID clearly has duplicates - one only has to look at the first page, there are duplicates listed thus the 480 is not correct. On the first page - one title is listed 3 times !!! 103.46.220.86 (talk) 23:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I can see that, but interpreting the data yourself is original research which is not permitted on Wikipedia. The source says 480 papers, so that is what we have to say in the article unless you can find a reliable source giving a different number. Alternatively, the whole claim about a specific number of papers can be removed. Adam Black  t &bull;  c 23:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The Scholia reference actually sources the ORCID reference - it is just not "wikidata" as you put it.
 * Scholia tools ambiguates duplicates and triplicates from its sources - it is an ongoing tool that looks to improve the accuracy of it's information unlike ORCID. 103.46.220.86 (talk) 23:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I did not say it was "just" Wikidata. I said it uses data from Wikidata. Adam Black  t &bull;  c 00:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes you did say that it "uses data from Wikidata" - my apologies.
 * For the title that is listed 3 times on ORCID, Scholia only lists it once. 103.46.220.86 (talk) 00:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)