User talk:103.49.50.254

March 2016
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Revolutionary Road (film). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Steve Jobs (2015 film), you may be blocked from editing. Egsan Bacon (talk) 18:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Little Children (film). Jim1138 (talk) 06:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. –Darkwind (talk) 03:45, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Reader (2008 film). Bbb23 (talk) 12:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at The Reader (2008 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 12:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 08:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sainik School, Amaravathinagar— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 17:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Avalanche, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 23:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pierce Brosnan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pierce Brosnan was changed by 103.49.50.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873822 on 2017-07-20T11:22:08+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 11:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)