User talk:103.5.134.251

April 2017
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Casino. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Toohool (talk) 17:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello Toohool, This is not a promotional link. The existing reference link in the references was not working and hence I provided a link which has the information about the content and therefore is a valid reference to include in bibliography. The dead link in the reference doesn't help users at all and therefore I added a more relevant and working link. I am not affiliated to the said website and I am fully aware that the links are no-follow links and therefore doesnt help at all in SEO. That is not the aim here. You should first read the article and then you would see that the link is relevant. In any case, if you feel that the broken dead link in the references is useful, I cannot justify it any further. It's your call, I am just trying to help the users, rest is upto you!

August 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Vijay Deverakonda, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Please do not add bold liberally. See MOS:BOLD.'' Ab207 (talk) 15:45, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vijay Deverakonda. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.   -- DaxServer (talk) 15:48, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Abijeet, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.   -- DaxServer (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Abijeet.   -- DaxServer (talk) 13:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Abijeet.   -- DaxServer (talk) 13:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Abijeet.   -- DaxServer (talk) 09:31, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Abijeet.   -- DaxServer (talk) 10:09, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 10:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jathi Ratnalu.   Pachu Kannan (talk) 10:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Twelfth grade. Largoplazo (talk) 08:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Abijeet.   — DaxServer (talk to me) 14:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

As you no doubt expected, you have been blocked from editing again, for continuing the same kind of editing that led to your previous block. Naturally, this time the block is for a significantly longer period. JBW (talk) 15:05, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Leonidlednev. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Ruby laser have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Leonidlednev (talk) 16:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm MathXplore. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pre-university course without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MathXplore (talk) 07:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)