User talk:103.82.0.23

May 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Grundy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   13:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Grundy, you may be blocked from editing.  AviCapt  ( talk to me! ) 10:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Grundy. ''You have been consistently adding the same information without providing sources, and occasionally providing obviously false information — I don't know what to believe, so I will assume everything without a source is false. Your behavior is disruptive — please stop adding such unsourced material.  AviCapt '' ( talk to me! ) 11:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 12:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Andy Grundy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Your previous block clearly had little to no effect as you are making the same unsourced and possibly defamatory edits that you got blocked for. I will remind you again — cite your additions to biographies of living persons, or do not re-add this content at all.  AviCapt '' ( talk to me! ) 14:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cumbum Cumbum (May 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Funnyfarmofdoom was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cumbum Cumbum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Cumbum_Cumbum Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Funnyfarmofdoom&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cumbum_Cumbum reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 11:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Speedy deletion of Draft:Cumbum Cumbum


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Cumbum Cumbum, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion review. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello, I'm Macaddct1984. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Homopolar generator—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 12:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Homopolar generator, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Wiiformii (talk) 12:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)