User talk:103.84.133.201

October 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Feminism in India has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:31, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Feminism in India was changed by 103.84.133.201 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952827 on 2018-10-08T14:31:15+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Feminism in India. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 14:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of people with the most children has been reverted. Your edit here to List of people with the most children was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-general/how-sultan-moulay-ismail-morocco-sired-1000-children-001386) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:00, 9 November 2018 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

December 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vagina dentata. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, I'm Felida97. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Swastika have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Felida97 (talk) 09:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2019
Hello, I'm Aranya. I noticed that you recently removed content from Human sexual activity without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Aranya (talk) 14:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rajeev Dhavan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 14:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2021
Hello, I'm AssumeGoodWraith. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sameer Wankhede without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   - AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs)  12:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I removed nothing instead I added more information about his personal life and provided richness to this article. If you found something which I removed, please mention it. -- This IP at 25 October 2021 at 12:35 (UTC)

Sameer Wankhede
In case you don't know Wikipedia's policies for Biography of Living Person are very strict. Also the burden of evidence rests with the editor who adds or restores the material. Regards. Eevee01(talk) 15:27, 25 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Just a quick reminder not to engage in edit warring. Please do take note of the three-revert rule (3RR) Equine-man (talk) 17:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)