User talk:103.94.50.177

December 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Elizabeth II, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 08:40, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at NGC 246, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 08:42, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Clyde H. Mapping. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to F. W. de Klerk—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Clyde H. Mapping (talk) 07:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to F. W. de Klerk. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Materialscientist (talk) 08:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)