User talk:104.37.210.249

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Boeing Bird of Prey has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Boeing Bird of Prey was changed by 104.37.210.249 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910572 on 2016-11-10T14:00:05+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gerard Butler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Justeditingtoday (talk) 15:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Hayden Christensen, you may be blocked from editing. Justeditingtoday (talk) 15:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Otjikoto Lake— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Psych has been reverted. Your edit here to Psych was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBDmCv_SBB__3XWJ-JceqVA) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Snake charming— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Snake charming. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Snake charming was changed by 104.37.210.249 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959387 on 2017-03-29T16:08:21+00:00.

May 2017
Hello, I'm DatGuy. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Arthur Hugh Clough seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dat GuyTalkContribs 12:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Guessing— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Province of Maryland, you may be blocked from editing. --   LuK3      (Talk)   13:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Ethan Allen, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 18:54, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to United States Department of Education has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:00, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: United States Department of Education was changed by 104.37.210.249 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861105 on 2017-12-13T14:00:44+00:00.

February 2018
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Shooting Stars (song)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  14:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Carlisle, Pennsylvania. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Nott Nott  19:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pennsylvania Chronicle— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 13:59, 9 May 2018 (UTC)