User talk:104.56.23.57

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (104.56.23.57) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and  [ create an account] . If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing!

Reference errors on 11 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Tsewang Paljor page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=685277947 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F685277947%7CTsewang Paljor%5D%5D Ask for help])

October 2015
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for evading a previous block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

May 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of oldest people by country, you may be blocked from editing. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 05:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at List of supercentenarians from the United States shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Not a good idea to edit war in this topic area. Which I'm sure you're already aware of. CommanderLinx (talk) 05:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions warning
CommanderLinx (talk) 05:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Oldest in Britain
Oldestinbritain was found to be an unreliable source in this discussion. It is also a self published source so it cannot be used as per WP:BLPSPS. The fact that someone who works for the GRG runs that site is irrelevant and doesn't make it a reliable source. CommanderLinx (talk) 07:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Read Ca2james's post here. Summed up pretty nicely. CommanderLinx (talk) 07:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 10:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for evading a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:56, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.