User talk:105.67.133.169

November 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Almoravid dynasty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 20:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Boeing 787 Dreamliner, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your addition also appeared to be promotional or possibly advertising. -Fnlayson (talk) 11:53, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Air Maroc. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 14:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Political status of Western Sahara. M.Bitton (talk) 17:36, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Political status of Western Sahara. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 18:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism, as done at Political_status_of_Western_Sahara. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 18:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.