User talk:106.195.0.123

June 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura has been reverted. Your edit here to Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://grandmuftisingapore.blogspot.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 05:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. User:Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 05:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Your edits relevant to Singapore clearly explains your COI to Singapore relevant article, anyways I have tried to improve the article but you have reverted and you have won the edit war, never seen such a case of COI in my wiki life. 106.195.0.123 (talk) 05:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Might as well say my userpage already indicated I am a Singaporean and my username is literally justanothersgwikieditor.. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 08:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura
Hi, please refer to WP:RS and also WP:LINKSPAM. Please read and understand what Wikipedia accepts for reliable sources and a blog is definitely not going to be reliable. If you feel that it is reliable, you can open up a discussion at noticeboard and ask it to be included. I do not have any COI with regards to MUIS and I like to ask do you have any COI with MUIS, the blogspot link you are promoting and the subject of the blog? --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 05:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)



Kindly explain how the link I had placed is spam. 106.195.0.123 (talk) 05:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * See new section below and also, specifically your action is spamming the same link again and again on the same article aka linkspam. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 05:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Ridiculous, you just have to explain how it is spam? Without diverting the discussion here and there. 106.195.0.123 (talk) 05:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I have already explained you are spamming the same link on this article and failed to discuss it properly on the talkpages. I am afraid your edit summaries are the real diversions of the linkspam issue. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 05:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)