User talk:106.69.115.45

Hi there, you seem to be editing in some changes to this wikipedia page which create a POV problem for the page, along with some bias. I have some examples to help you correct this: "Topics raised by former and current players often include criticism of its extremely dated and often bug-riddled codebase, large number of missing features common to the cyberpunk theme (decking, matrix use, etc), and widespread abuse by its volunteer staff team of their positions for their own personal gain, including allegations of sexual assault and predatory behaviour."

You are citing an entire reddit search history for 'Sindome', which is very unspecific. I have reviewed this search history and a number of Reddit posts and see a single user 'Ephemeralis' criticizing the codebase as bug riddled and extremely dated, though this person does this on multiple occasions, that does not constitute multiple sources. The specific Reddit thread might be a better reference. Here it is: https://www.reddit.com/r/MUD/comments/ecqr2o/should_i_play_sindome/fbk71j5/?context=3 It also seems to include a response from what appears to be one of the game creators, effectively debating the claim being made in your wikipedia edits.

You also should consider counter sources which provide a more complete picture, here is an example: https://www.sindome.org/bgbb/game-discussion/new-game-features/-2019--year-end-improvements-wrap-up-376/ which seems to describe dozens or more improvements and bug fixes made in 2019, which are coming directly from the game creators and are not second hand information.

You are also using a website as a reference and basis for some of the content edits (clubbanished.com) which appears to be a website intended to 'dox' the creators of Sindome, by a group of people who have admitted to being removed from that community. This is not a respectable source and you should consider calling that out, otherwise you are not providing a whole truth, but rather a biased one. The article has a POV problem, and the POV being introduced is not one of objectivity but of subjectivity.

Another issue with POV comes here: "Sindome's rigid "anti-OOC" discussion rules have been described as being a tool wielded by the administration to silence critics on their platforms, preventing players affected by instances of abuse from speaking up or discovering that they're being taken advantage of. [4] In addition, these rules have reportedly been flaunted by members of the GM team themselves in the past, with many public incidents of such spilling over onto associated social media sites. "

There doesn't appear to be a reference to it spilling over onto social media sites-- aside from Reddit, which was already cited earlier. Also, you are not linking to the actual rules of the Sindome community to provide context. You could do that with a reference to: https://www.sindome.org/rules/

There appears to be a good amount of discussion around why the rule exists both on their own forums and on Reddit, which you could reference. There is also a reddit thread debating this issue more generally, but which has a post from one of the Sindome admin with their thinking behind the rule, which you could reference here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MUD/comments/e98kui/ooc_contact_rules_and_why_you_should_get_rid_of/fap8uos/?context=3

These are just some examples, but hopefully you find them helpful!