User talk:107.127.39.24

July 2021
I didn't do it. Wikipedia just randomly blames folks for making changes.

May 2021
Hello, I'm Nardog. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Novus ordo seclorum have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nardog (talk) 02:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at World Wide Web. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  00:01, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
There's a discussion underway at Talk: Harrison Birtwistle about adding an infobox. Please don't add one until there's a decision on whether to break the usual consensus. Thanks. Storchy (talk) 13:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Harrison Birtwistle, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. &#8209;&#8209;Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:18, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Your recent editing history at Kay Mellor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''If you want to discuss including this wording, please take it to the article's talk page, rather than unilaterally reverting over and over; Wikipedia is built on consensus. Thanks!'' Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 22:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Considering you've continued to revert far beyond the three revert rule, I've started a thread over at the Edit Warring noticeboard. Feel free to chime in if you have anything to add. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 01:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)