User talk:107.219.74.182

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * No original research – Wikipedia articles must not contain original research
 * Reliable sources  – changes to text need to be back up by reliable sources.
 * Conflict of interest  – do not edit Wikipedia in your own interests
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring and sockpuppetry.


 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. Paul H. (talk) 19:50, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Paul H. (talk) 19:50, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chakra, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   09:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello 107.219.74.182, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to History of Andhra Pradesh have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

YOU ARE LYING.. THERE IS NO COPYRIGHT VIOLATION. SHOW ME WHAT COPYRIGHT YOU TALK OF AND STOP REMOVING CONTENT TO ASSERT BRAHMIN HEGEMONY
 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 13:46, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019
I do understand the policy and see that Brahmanical narrative is being imposed in the name of editorial rights Hello, I'm Donner60. Your recent edit to Kanva dynasty appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:10, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

You mean to say my disputing the assertion that Kanva was Brahmin based on myths? Why would one source be more accurate than others in Myths. There is no inscription of Kanva as Brahmin caste. There are multiple tales/myths.. so creating antiquity of Brahmin system and caste and removing citations which dispute it is an exercise in caste perpetuation. Please explain your reasons for stating what I put in is incorrect and what is currently there as correct. Is there any evidence that one myth is more accurate than other ? No. It is basically what you want to believe and broadcast

April 2019
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Andhra Ikshvaku without adequately explaining why. If you're making claims that the information given in the cited sources is "unsubstantiated" or "debated", you need to provide reliable sources that support such claims. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. utcursch &#124; talk 12:20, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Ikshvaku dynasty. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 21:34, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Why would you call it Ikshvaku when the Inscriptions clearly state it is Ikhakhu. Is that not vandalism of the history of Andhra?? You are the one who is making unsubstantiated claims based on mythical puranas which have multiple narrative. Inscriptions are clear as per archaeological record. Remove Ikshvaku. It is an insult on our history

May 2019
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Kamma (caste). Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:58, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

What is legitimate talk? Can you define it.. Kamma is a caste which is pretty recent. Do not bring your caste mindset to wikipedia. Cast is form of illegitimate mindset. Clean your mind — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.219.74.182 (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Firstly, you are are responding to a warning from May 2019. Secondly, the issue raised was this edit, in which another editor's comment was refactored by someone at this IP address. This is not allowed, for what should be obvious reasons, and it has nothing to do with the argument about caste. "Legitimate talk" is not the matter to be concerned with, because it's two random words taken out of context. "Do not change another editor's comment" is the important part. Understand now? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 07:11, 2 May 2019 (UTC) Arbitration for what? Please go to google books and do a basic search on Ikhaku

May 2019
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Delhi Sultanate. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 07:14, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Samudragupta. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. utcursch &#124; talk 17:40, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Marwar. utcursch &#124; talk 23:00, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. utcursch &#124; talk 21:21, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * This is for persistently making changes that are directly contradicted and/or unsupported by the cited sources. utcursch &#124; talk 21:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

I Have NOT MADE PERSISTENT UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS. THAT IS YOUR BIAS. I challenge you to go look at the archaeology association of INDIA decipherment of IKKAKU. IKSHVAKU IS SANSKRIT NOT THAT IT IS A PROBLEM BUT REMOVING THE PALI VERSION WHICH IS THE ACTUAL QUOTED IN THE INSCRIPTION TO ATTACH PURANIC MYTHS IS NOT GOOD. THE USE OF THE WORD PERSISTENT TO SLANDER IS YOUR EGO AND DISDAIN FOR TRUTH
 * Once again, you are indulging in original research. For example, here you added the claim that "The Banyan tree stands for enlightenment of Budha", citing India Through the Ages as a source. The source does not even mention this particular banyan tree; it only talks about the Bodhi Tree. In the same edit you cited an India Today article, using it as a source for the statement "Traditionally the Bodhi tree stood for wisdom of Buddha and is revered for it." The article does not mention Bodhi tree or Buddha at all.
 * You're free to challenge existing unsourced / poorly-sourced content in an article, but please do not replace it with dubiously-sourced stuff. utcursch &#124; talk 01:46, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

W

Really Utkarsh? Come one- that Banyan tree is Marri. That Banyan tree is sacred to the Buddhists. After attaining enlightenment, Lord Buddha is believed to have sat under a Banyan tree for seven days. This known world over. But for you this is poorly sourced content. Here is link on Importance of Banyan tree. Please do not remove things just because they are contradictory to Brahmin spun narratives https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/Significance-of-the-Banyan/articleshow/8856719.cms. You have blocked me for correcting Ikshvaku to Ikhaku-the name used in inscriptions. You have problem with me defining IKHAKHU name as per Telugu dictionary-they are Telugu king-would you rather I use French dictonary or Latin?. You have problem with stating the obvious that Banyan tree has significance for Buddhist. So stop blocking and unblock your own mind — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.219.74.182 (talk • contribs)


 * I did not block you for claiming that Banyan tree is sacred to Buddhists or "correcting Ikshvaku to Ikhaku". I blocked you for citing sources that do not support the claims you are adding to the articles. Once again, please see WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NOR -- if you haven't gone through WP:TUTORIAL, please do so. utcursch &#124; talk 14:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Really? The archaeological survey of Indian clearly states IKhaku was mentioned in inscriptions. If you chose you could have corrected the citation. But instead you chose to obsess on things that contradict your own Brahmanical bent of mind. I wish wiki had a policy where editors would first post their caste and then edit. I am sudra and the Brahmin narratives and usage of Brahmin and racist sources that back Brahmin thesis to create a narrative is offensive to me. I will dispute when it comes to my history. You dont have sole ownership claiming to be an editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.219.74.182 (talk • contribs)


 * I would have "corrected the citation", if you had actually provided a citation. You didn't, despite the fact that you have already been told about Help:Referencing for beginners and Reliable sources above.
 * Here are your three edits to the article Andhra Ikshvaku: - the only changes you made involved removal of sourced content. You did not add any ASI report / article as a source. Your Buddhism-Banyan edits have already been explained above.
 * If scholarly sources in an article are "offensive" to you, please find other reliable sources that say so. Your personal opinions do not matter: if we allow that, any random person on the Internet can remove sourced content claiming that the sources are "offensive" to them.
 * I don't subscribe to the caste system, but for what it's worth: both my parents come from a caste that is classified among the Scheduled Castes in some areas, and among the Other Backward Classes in other areas. So, you can stop playing victim. Blatantly violating Wikipedia policies and then insinuating that you were blocked / warned for being a non-Brahmin won't work. Once again, go through WP:TUTORIAL, if you haven't already. utcursch &#124; talk 17:36, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Arikamedu. utcursch &#124; talk 23:37, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notification: Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 17:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kṣitigarbha, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Farang Rak Tham  (Talk) 13:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2019
This is your only warning; if you remove reliably-sourced content from Wikipedia again, as you did at Nagarjuna and Gautamiputra Satakarni, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have already been given several warnings regarding Wikipedia's no original research and verifiability policies. You can't simply dismiss scholarly books written by reputed academics and published by solid publishers (including non-Indian universities) as unreliable, simply because you don't agree with them. If you want to portray these sources as unreliable, please present some other sources which support your assertion: your personal opinion doesn't count. utcursch &#124; talk 14:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


 * What is reliable and Scholarly? Tons of "scholarly" materials claimed white Aryan supremacy. The book birth of orientalis by PENN STATE UNIVERSITY " Modern Orientalism is not a brainchild of nineteenth-century European imperialists and colonialists, but, as Urs App demonstrates, was born in the eighteenth century after a very long gestation period defined less by economic or political motives than by religious ideology". The brahmin wiki editors are no different than the Europeans who confused BRAMANA, Brahmin caste and Brahma. Scholar and Reputed are misused and abused given the caste and race content in the academic world. So let us talk primary sources. Including definition of words. Are we defining it by location of dynasty with Dravidian Munda reference to Sanskrit words? Or is this based on the Nazi era and Brahmin claims of Sanskrit being a spoken language of white european class? How do you define the word Marri. Marri in Telugu is Banyan tree. Banyan tree is where Budha is considered to have englighment. That is a metaphor. So let us talk specifics instead of appeal to authority of the very same authors who have created racist casteist baises
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Please see WP:RS. If you have concerns about a particular source not being reliable, drop a note at WP:RSN. If you continue to engage in disruptive behavior, you will be blocked for a long time. utcursch &#124; talk 14:28, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Your addition to Dravidian folk religion has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dravidian folk religion, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 00:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Durga. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CLCStudent (talk) 23:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Patala, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 05:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Pikavoom. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Min (god) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Pikavoom (talk) 07:39, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sahasrara. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:55, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Datura metel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Mr Fink (talk) 01:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)