User talk:107.4.134.26

March 2021
Hello, I'm Nightwolf1223. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Capitol Hill Organized Protest have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. WP:NPOV Nightwolf1223 (talk) 22:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Nightwolf1223 Not at all, obviously this was an insurrection. If you have other views that is merely political bias.
 * Please see WP:NPOV. Nightwolf1223 (talk) 22:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Nightwolf1223- Really? That's all you got, see WP:WORLDVIEW. I get that Wikipedia is now dominated by social liberal paradigm but let's not be intellectually dishonest. An armed rebellion dictating that the civilian government and the police have no authority in the area and controlling 6 blocks is an insurrection, a rebellion against the authorities. You may choose to ascribe value to that however you want but to incorrectly describe it as a "protest" is a form of WP:BIAS. See the trees in the forest.

We both know that the above is true. In fact this is an example of over control of the narrative by using creative language to support a very narrow WP:POV.


 * Are you even listening to me? Here at Wikipedia, we do not support one side or another but rather do our best to keep a neutral view. Nightwolf1223 (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Nightwolf1223, FDW777 Wikipedia as a whole already acknowledges inherent bias in the content of Wikipedia. The demographics whom make up the vast of editors and administrators in power of English wikipedia articles do not allow for a multitude of views. Even it's founder acknowledged this. It is disingenuous to rhetorically state "are you listening to me".
 * We also know that the vast majority of secondary sources related to current topics are politically not neutral with the increasing rise of political partisanship, examples such as this subject of political extremism and so on. It is well known that the vast majority of American media companies are staffed and controlled by an "overwhelming liberal composition" that is "far to the left of the typical American" . Despite the mental gymnastics being used to try to refute this perception, it has rang particularly factual with reference to the manner in which defining the "correct" words, text and messaging in not just news sources, but also social media, reddit, facebook, twitter, wikipedia and so on. Cancel_culture is objectively an example of this manifesting control of the correct narrative. The fact that you collectively went straight to ban and sanction of this IP (even in lieu of WP:Bebold and WP:NORULES) is proof that Wikipedia does indeed have political systemic bias and cannot accept multiple diverse views but rather assumes the most acceptable politically left view is the most appropriate and the only allowable way to interpret events.

I will no longer edit current political events articles per this discussion, I request that you please delete this talk page.107.4.134.26 (talk) 18:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)