User talk:107.77.165.5

February 2017
Hello, I'm JueLinLi. An edit that you recently made to Encrypt (film) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JueLinLi (talk) 06:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Encrypt (film). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Encrypt (film) was changed by 107.77.165.5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.933061 on 2017-02-08T06:02:55+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arthur W. Van Horn, you may be blocked from editing. Jus da  fax   06:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Arthur W. Van Horn. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Arthur W. Van Horn was changed by 107.77.165.5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85069 on 2017-02-08T06:12:51+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pure Food and Drug Act has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pure Food and Drug Act was changed by 107.77.165.5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964427 on 2017-02-13T20:00:51+00:00.

September 2017
Hello, I'm Dane. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Indian Creek Senior High School— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --  Dane talk  03:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Zahra Khanom Tadj es-Saltaneh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Simplexity22 (talk) 00:41, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bran Mak Morn, you may be blocked from editing. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 04:32, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 17:14, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2017
Hello, I'm AntiCompositeNumber. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Charlie Rose, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AntiCompositeNumber (Ring me) 18:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ridgway, Colorado, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 00:24, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Daft Punk. Dolfinz1972 (talk) 03:55, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Immortals (song). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. And likely just made up  Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Try Everything. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Gender inequality in curricula. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 17:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cash Luna—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. lavender &#124;(formerly HMSSolent )&#124; lambast 04:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to February 1979. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 06:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to February 1979, you may be blocked from editing. Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 06:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Larry Hockett (Talk) 07:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.