User talk:107.77.209.142

January 2017
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wayne Robinson (basketball)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.   Wikipelli Talk   00:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Antifa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Simplexity22 (talk) 01:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Talkback
Simplexity22 (talk) 02:10, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

I left another reply on my talk page, FYI. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:50, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Antifa, you may be blocked from editing. If you want to write about this "Antifa Front group" or whatever, then create an article about it..don't insert it into a disambiguation page. Bennv3771 (talk) 03:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * also, is it standard to accuse someone of vandalism just for not knowing your protocols off the bat? that's a little unfriendly. it's all well sourced and discussed with another user on the talk page. 107.77.209.142 (talk) 03:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * For the record, the other user (me) didn't endorse your edit. Simplexity22 (talk) 03:30, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * It was discussed and you were informed here that a disambiguation page is not the appropriate place for your edits yet you ignored it and persisted..that is disruptive editing, hence my warning. Bennv3771 (talk) 03:26, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * there was no where discussed or warned of inappropriate placement. i never said it was endorsed i said it was discussed. i see a lot of flagrant accusations and misrepresentations from both of you. there was a message that said links aren't usually meant for disambiguation pages during the editing process but i wasn't making links i was making references. and it said "not usually" not "some random person will suddenly jump down your throat and make threats if you press save.... 107.77.209.142 (talk) 04:01, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * That is not the revision I specifically linked to. Anyway, this discussion is going nowhere, if you want to play the victim, fine go ahead. Just stop the disruptive edits, especially since you have been informed that it is inappropriate and directed to WP:DAB twice. Bennv3771 (talk) 04:06, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

what the hell are you talking about then? do you even know? "disruptive edits" ? what revision did you link to? 107.77.209.142 (talk) 04:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Click on the external link in my first reply. Bennv3771 (talk) 04:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * and what of it? what are you trying to say that means? i'm not playing victim, i'm just saying you're a liar and an ass hole. 107.77.209.142 (talk) 04:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm saying you were informed that your edits were not appropriate for a disambiguation page, and you ignored it and reinserted those inappropriate edits again, which I then reverted: that is disruptive and hence my warning. Anyway, there is no point to this conversation, so I won't reply anymore unless you have something constructive to discuss other than name-calling, which I could warn you for but I won't. Bennv3771 (talk) 04:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * you call it name calling and i call it an accurite discription. where do you see either of the two words you're claiming were used? you're putting words in someone elses mouth and then insisting they're true. you misconstrue the facts, you're a liar. it's not name calling, it's accurite. people using lies to get their way are accuritly described as ass holes. i dont know what your name is but i doubt anyone referes to you by it, ever. 107.77.209.142 (talk) 04:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. TheDragonFire (talk) 04:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * i showed solid basis for both terms used. does wiki not endorse well sorced descriptions? people are just filthy with machinations around here. 107.77.209.142 (talk) 04:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * This edit is highly inappropriate and unsourced. You were informed that a disambiguation page is not the appropriate page to place that content, and that you needed to take it elsewhere. You made the edit again. You were told again that a disambiguation page is not the appropriate page to place that content. This constitutes disruptive editing, and you were warned appropriately. You then proceeded to attack other users. This is not appropriate behaviour for Wikipedia. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. We are all here to build an encyclopedia, so if you'd like assistance in appropriately contributing your content, then we are all here to help. You might want to start by reading the tutorial. TheDragonFire (talk) 05:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Rahm Emanuel— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 16:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Aer Lingus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anilingus, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Anilingus was changed by 107.77.209.142 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880649 on 2018-06-11T16:40:41+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:40, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Romeoville High School. Shellwood (talk) 16:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Recent edits to The Aftermath (Bonded by Blood album)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Aftermath (Bonded by Blood album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2020 (UTC)