User talk:107.77.215.42

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (107.77.215.42) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and  [ create an account] . If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  22:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Tori Kelly with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Should've Been Us with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:37, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Should've Been Us with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Suit & Tie with this edit.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Patrick Murphy (Florida politician). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - MrX 02:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dunedin, Florida without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 12:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello Denisarona. It was brought to my attention this morning that an entry was made using an organization and persons name without permission, edit history appears to confirm that. The current data listed is partly inaccurate and unconfirmed, with only the ordinance being verifiable. The entry should be removed unless all of the claims can be confirmed; wouldn't you agree?

Dunedin FL
Hello Denisarona. It was brought to my attention this morning that an entry was made using an organization and persons name without permission, edit history appears to confirm that. The current data listed is partly inaccurate and unconfirmed, with only the ordinance being verifiable. The entry should be removed unless all of the claims can be confirmed; wouldn't you agree?