User talk:107.77.223.214

June 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Maryse Liburdi, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:07, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Tom Hollander, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Tom Hollander. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Super Mario  Man – Talk 21:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John Culberson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   01:47, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Martha Roby, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   01:47, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Martha McSally.  General Ization  Talk   01:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Disruptive? An editor effectively templates dozens of political articles with a non RS source. I'm trying to clean it up. 107.77.223.214 (talk) 01:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Two hundred and twenty nine Congressional representatives voted to table the motion; that is a matter of public record. That the IP editor made note of this, with a cited source (The Independent being a reliable source, but there are certainly many others) on articles pertaining to a number of House members is unremarkable and does not show bias.  In fact, if they showed bias it was only by "templating" (as you put it) a small number.  Your removal of the edits en masse is more POV than their original edits, and if you continue you will be blocked from editing.  General Ization   Talk   01:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Software bug, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Current events/2012 March 30. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Art LaPella (talk) 00:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The Young Turks— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Luke Waterfall. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:36, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.