User talk:107.77.223.22

October 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to David Auerbach, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 06:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Its been explained in about half a dozen edit summaries. 107.77.223.22 (talk) 06:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at David Auerbach, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ammarpad (talk) 06:36, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on David Auerbach. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 06:36, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If you’d read the source you’d have seen the edit I removed wasn’t supported. It was irresponsible of you to restore it over BLP objections. 107.77.223.157 (talk) 08:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as done at David Auerbach. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 11:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 * I removed unsourced defamatory claims from David Auerbach. They were restored without consensus or even discussion by several editors, a BLP violation. This continued until injected some sanity on the talk page. . Your and Materialscientist's "solution" was to ignore the BLP violations, protect the page so I couldn't edit, then block me.


 * If you didn't take the time to review my edits and see they were correct and exempt from 3RR you failed in your duties. If you did and these actions were the result, the only conclusion is you're motivated more by pettiness than desire to build an encyclopedia according to policy and you have no business being admins. Both of you should be ashamed. 107.77.223.188 (talk) 17:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)