User talk:108.162.103.13/Archive 1

August 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Triple Crown (professional wrestling) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Triple Crown (professional wrestling) was changed by 108.162.103.13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886172 on 2017-08-01T01:37:28+00:00.
 * I just want to note that this is one of the few erros I've seen Cluebot make. The changes 108.162 make were correct.LM2000 (talk) 01:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Mohammed Naguib. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm Nihlus Kryik. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to National Socialist Movement (United States)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — nihlus kryik   ( talk ) 00:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Socialist Movement (United States), you may be blocked from editing. — nihlus kryik   ( talk ) 00:50, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

I can do whatever I want.

September 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to National Socialist Movement (United States) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:50, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: National Socialist Movement (United States) was changed by 108.162.103.13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877421 on 2017-09-05T05:50:33+00:00.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — nihlus kryik   ( talk ) 05:57, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm PureRED. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tanzania without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please discuss potentially controversial changes on the article's talk page. Pure RED  &#124;  talk to me   &#124; 20:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tanzania, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Please seek WP:CONSENSUS on the article's talk page before continuing to make potentially controversial changes to articles. Pure RED  &#124;  talk to me   &#124; 21:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tanzania, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 21:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Try me.

Canadian Red Ensign
What, exactly, is a "baffon"? Rockypedia (talk) 06:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Canadian Red Ensign. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 07:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

17 October 2017
Your recent editing history at The Protectorate shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 02:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You are not to delete any more comments from this page. Instead you may archive them in /Archive 1 if you wish (however you will not be able to do that until this block is ended. I am blocking this account for a month because you have started to edit war on the same page for which Callanecc blocked you for a week less than two weeks ago.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for for persistently making disruptive edits, as done at The Protectorate. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. PBS (talk) 19:40, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.