User talk:108.163.68.2

February 2018
Hello, I'm JMS Old Al. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sam Houston have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Alex (Talk) 19:34, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Treaty of 1818 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Treaty of 1818 was changed by 108.163.68.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970965 on 2018-03-05T15:57:40+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Treaty of 1818. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:58, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Treaty of 1818, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File talk:Rainbow-diagram-ROYGBIV.svg


A tag has been placed on File talk:Rainbow-diagram-ROYGBIV.svg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jan Myšák (talk) 19:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Spam Prevention Early Warning System—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 19:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm Netherzone. An edit that you recently made to Pueblo Revival architecture seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Netherzone (talk) 18:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cozumel raccoon—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  17:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cozumel raccoon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 17:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Responsibility for the September 11 attacks, you may be blocked from editing. Psu256 (talk) 18:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Moses Austin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 13:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)