User talk:108.183.17.37

The Wikipedia Obituary

Wikipedia censors all legitimate and constructive edits and excludes all informed readers of their right to update their community and visitors to new findings that point out glaring mistakes in the original author's reporting of information. As such, Wikipedia is failing their readership and the general Internet community by undoing, erasing, censoring and eliminating all such corrections and correlations that identify parallel view points and criticisms, of which, most are fact-based and a attempt to improve the platform.

The only way to save the Wikipedia project experiment, is to open the platform to real readership based improvements, of which, by the looks of the present, monopolistic information cabal, that presides over this platform. It is doubtful that the life saving changes, required to save this archive, will be implemented. The guilt of who has poisoned this well of information, rests solely upon the moderators, and complacent administrators, who stand back by the side, and allow this to occur.

Wikipedia will fail to meet the peoples expectation, to promote fact-based reporting, but will succeed at their unstated mission to censor the servers holding the root of their content. That promotes nothing good, or sustainable for them and will only act as a two edge sword, bringing down in financial ruin, their own platform. People will donate less and less to this cause, because of who is moderating the cache of knowledge.

I for one, will not support this cause financially, and advise all that read this comment to save their money and withdraw all support from this corrupt organization. Your waisting your precious resources if you do. The only recourse of saving this platform is if the people running it repent. .they should also look over their own personal lives and come to their senses, that they also have been infected, with a proverbial mind disease. . .called madness.

It is maddening to see what this crowd supports, in terms of information suppression. .not only do they attack the scientific reporting of breakthroughs, but they attack the religious doctrines as well. .

'Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear [Yahwah] God, and keep his commandments for this is the whole duty of man.' Ecc. 12:13

April 2019
Hello, I'm IdreamofJeanie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Glory (religion) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 14:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Flyer22 Reborn/Past introduction. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jeb3 Talk at me here  14:48, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Natureium (talk) 15:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian. Kb03 (talk) 15:22, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:44, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.