User talk:108.216.192.251

March 2024
Hello, I'm CSMention269. I noticed that you recently removed content from Enamorándonos without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CSMention269 (talk) 01:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Enamorándonos, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. akidfrombethany! (talk|contribs) 01:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)


 * STFU 108.216.192.251 (talk) 01:46, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Enamorándonos, you may be blocked from editing. There's a source provided in the article debunking your claims. akidfrombethany! (talk|contribs) 01:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Noooo. Who the hell are you to tell me what to do or not. This is a free space and whoever considers something to be wrong will edit. Go away and get a life. Stay in India and shut up!! 108.216.192.251 (talk) 01:53, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You're not the owner of this site! Get a life STFU 108.216.192.251 (talk) 01:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Enamorándonos. ''This article has a valid source. If you do not agree, rewrite it so it is no longer "misleading."'' akidfrombethany! (talk|contribs) 01:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Morgan Eckroth.  Cerebral726 (talk) 01:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Miguel de Cervantes seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Cassiopeia  talk  03:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, good evening. It is not a matter of opinion if the article referenced says it was voted as the best book of all time. It should be acknowledged that it was voted as such and in a different sentence explain it is considered one of the greatest works of all time; if not, it becomes inaccurate to quote something and change its context. It is demeaning to the writer and his work. 108.216.192.251 (talk) 03:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)