User talk:108.35.72.233

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! – S. Rich (talk) 04:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that in this edit to Totalitarianism, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I explained the removal of the content. The citations that Foorgood keeps restoring are all highly contested and controversial pieces of work, most of which share the personal opinion of a historian or political scientist, rather than just historically factual and neutral information 108.35.72.233 (talk) 19:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Take it to the article talkpage, at this point, the implied and actual consensus here is against you, with SPF later retracting their initial statement on DaEditorz (your?) talkpage, and Doug Weller also clearly considers that those sources are reliable.
 * I'm tempted to request that the whole page be placed under full protection, as you seem to be quite sure that this is something best resolved by edit warring with multiple users, rather than by discussion at the proper venue, I.e. the article talkpage.
 * Consider this to be your mandatory edit warring warning. Edit warring is disruptive, no matter how many times you revert.
 * Also, I would like to give you a general reminder that editing whilst logged out can be considered sockpuppetry if done abusively or to evade sanctions or scrutiny. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 01:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Deportation of the Crimean Tatars, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)