User talk:108.55.14.106

November 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Samuel de Champlain has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Samuel de Champlain was changed by 108.55.14.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877036 on 2017-11-28T19:00:37+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Samuel de Champlain. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Hangman (game), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fieryninja (talk) 17:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hangman (game). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fieryninja (talk) 14:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

November 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Super Bowl. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:46, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Super Bowl, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Super Bowl. ... disco spinster   talk  16:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 16:57, 14 November 2022 (UTC)