User talk:108.58.65.202

Welcome
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Warning on vandalism by unjustified and repeated removal of sourced content
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Jeffrey Beall, you may be blocked from editing. You have now removed text from the Beall article relating to his education several times, each time removing the sources justifying the material, and done so without explanation. This is unacceptable. If you have an issue to raise, please start a discussion at talk:Jeffrey Beall, but continuing the way you are going will only result in this IP address being blocked from editing or the article protected from editing by anonymous IP accounts. EdChem (talk) 19:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Help me!
Hello, on Jeffrey Beall on Wikipedia, there is a source that does not exist: #3 - http://people.auraria.edu/jeffrey-beall/sites/people.auraria.edu.Jeffrey_Beall/files/cv/Jeffrey-Beall-CV.pdf. If you visit it, you will receive an error message. We were removing the sentence with his credentials as it appears that he in fact does not have those credentials. Please assist. Thank you.

Please help me with...

108.58.65.202 (talk) 20:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


 * How do you arrive from "the link is broken" at "he in fact does not have those credentials"? I have added an archived copy of that page to the article on Beall; the website did indeed say what it was cited for. Huon (talk) 21:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Please read Conflict of interest and the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Since you work for Nova Science Publishers, you have a COI in respect of them, and since they could reasonably be considered to be in dispute with Jeffrey Beall you also have a COI there. That means that you should not edit directly about those subjects, but may make suggestions on article talk pages, declaring your interest, for uninvolved users to consider. JohnCD (talk) 21:45, 21 November 2016 (UTC)