User talk:108.69.155.130

September 2022
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of disaster films, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:43, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

You do not need a reference to cross reference two related wikipedia articles. If you did, then you need to delete the rest of wikipedia, you troll, which is apparently what you are doing anyway.

QUOTE: "Welcome to my Talk page. Please note the following- I may not respond to any un-civil comments left here; in fact, I may summarily delete them. If you don't trust yourself to speak civilly, please feel free to chill out for a bit, and come back here when you feel you can speak to me civilly. You may wish to consider whether a discussion would be more productive at a specific article's Talk page, where other editors will more easily be able to view the conversation and offer feedback. Before starting a thread to discuss any removals of unsourced material from articles, please review WP:V and WP:BURDEN. I will expect any discussions to take those policies into consideration. Also, please note that I have already been the subject of an ANI discussion regarding my removal of uncited material; I will expect any discussions of such here to go beyond what was raised during that discussion. Please be aware that just because something is handled a certain way elsewhere on Wikipedia does not mean it is okay for it to be repeated; it is possible the matter was handled improperly at the location being used as a precedent. For more information, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Thank you for your consideration and civility!"

== == == == ==

This nonsense "DEFENSIVE QUOTE" you got posted on your webpage is proof of your ill intentions on here, because you already know what you are doing is wrong and riddled with bad motives, (trolling). So I am not the first to write to you and point out the fact that what you are doing on wikipedia is destroying this website, not helping or enhancing it. You certainly do not care about any human being who is using Wikipedia to look up information.

Here is an example of another online troll here on Wikipedia. He even cry-babys on his own webpage that if comments do not meet with his infantile approval, he deletes them. I wonder why he has to warn people up front about his hyper sensitive feelings? I assume it is because he is just another cyber bully and troll on wikipedia.

First off, Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. It is meant as a resource for people to be able to look up information that they could not find elsewhere, or did not find elsewhere. Therefore, Wikipedia is for the person seeking information, not for your personal ego aggrandizement or to fulfill your nagging insecurity complex to bully others. Really, it is snot-nosed punks and bullys like you that make Wikipedia such a horrible and traumatic website. Since you are obviously the beginner here, I suggest for you to look up the fact that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort and adhere to the Wikipedia guidelines on that subject..

Also, if you were not so illiterate, you would have read the article "Terror in the Sky" and got your precious reference there. However, if it is necessary to redundantly reference every little nook and cranny over and over and over again, then you need to get busy to delete the rest of Wikipedia. You have no right to single out one little cross reference here within Wikipedia, proper, when most of the rest of wikipedia is not referenced in a credible fashion anyway.

Really, website links are never a credible reference, due to link rot. Where will you find an outside reference to an inside cross reference inside two Wikipedia pages anyway? Need a reference just to cross-link two wikipedia articles that are already referenced on the main article in the first place? How insane is that, I wonder? So it just shows you are another cyber bully on wikipedia all out for your ego, and not informational gathering and sharing for a real audience who would seek such information.

But if you really had the spirit of collaboration, then you would have already read the article it referenced in question and "contributed" to the betterment of an article that you really are blocking access to information to others who might be seeking it. Really, you are no different than a Nazi book-burner. You are an information burner: ignorance is bliss. Hitler would be proud of you.

Like I said, you already know you are on here with bad motives, which is why you get so many persons that are critical of you for your cyber bully and troll behavior, to where you feel compelled to warn people up front that you will delete their critique/comments to you for your hacking their collaborations and contributions on here.

Really a$$h01e, I do not have time for you or your childish bu11$Њi†. As far as I am concerned, you can delete this entire wikipedia for all I care, which is obvious that you have been doing, because you have drawn countless criticisms from others who were on here making positive effort and trying to make Wikipedia a better resource for all. As long as evil, ego-ridden non-humans like you are allowed to roam and troll on this website, there is no hope for Wikipedia ever to become a legit resource.

So I suggest for you to go delete the article "Terror in the Sky" and any other article and links you can find on here that does not meet with your infantile approval, until you got this whole thing deleted. And then the whole wikipedia problem will be solved permanently. It is obvious that people like you troll on here because you are mentally ill and got nothing else to do in life. How small-minded you really are. I made my positive contribution to cross-link an article. If you feel it needs another reference to prevent article orphaning, other than its main article, then you can add it. But you didn't. So that is proof that your main motive on Wikipedia is to destroy, not improve this website.

So here is my brave and bold edit back to you: go ƒμ¢k yourself, you g0₯₯amned £ow£ife £imp₯i¢k. I hope you receive all your bad karma back a billion times over, because you deserve it, you g0₯₯amned information-burning Nazi. So ƒμ¢k you and the horse you rode in on, you na$†y ƒμ¢k!!