User talk:109.132.104.178

November 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Barreleye—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Renewal6. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Israel Putnam have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Renewal6 (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * sorry i thought i was in sandbox, it wont happen again.
 * my bad! 109.132.104.178 (talk) 09:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Materialscientist (talk) 09:57, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

i would like you to give me a reason why you decline this appeal. there is no explanation and this does not seem a valid response to my request
 * I would like you to give me a reason why I shouldn't extend your block substantially. --Yamla (talk) 13:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

READ THIS I have received two extremely inadequate responses,(in my honest opinion) one of which put words in my mouth that I never claimed or even suggested. Furthermore, after I composed a long appeal, that same one replied with a sarcastic and unbased response, giving me no reason why my request was denied, and no information on how to stay out of trouble in the future 109.132.104.178 (talk) 13:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * You indicate your edits were based on "outside sources (NY times, New York post, and fox news". Please provide your specific reference from one of those three sources that indicated Mikhail Gorbachev was a "sigma mega giga chad". Or that Israel Putnam was saved from a ritual pizza party, or that he was born in 1918 or 1984. If you are unable to do so, perhaps it's time for you to admit you were just vandalising and not accidentally including information from unreliable sources. And stop wasting our time. Consider your next response carefully. --Yamla (talk) 13:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

I believe I did admit to putting false info on the page,(if I did not tell me) and expressed my commitment to not doing this again. when I mentioned other sources I was making a joke in an attempt to break the ice (I now realize that i need to keep it formal, and should have mentioned I was kidding) I again deeply apologize for doing this and I will not do this again.

(also I do not understand what you mean with your last statement, if it is not necessary to explain I am fine with that) this is not another appeal, it is just a response

this is somewhat unrelated but a friend asked me what to do if you see something that isn't true on wikipedia, but you don't know the specifics of what really happened (ex: person A sees page about treatment of prisoners of war, finds out from college professor that those torture methods were not used in that time period, but doesnt know what method they used, so they can't edit it and redo it with the truth.) what should they do? thanks in advance
 * Your friend should do nothing. See Verifiability, not truth. --Yamla (talk) 10:11, 9 January 2024 (UTC)


 * well, if they did that then someone could vandalise and get away with it. this is a genuine question which i would greatly appreciated some advice on 109.132.104.178 (talk) 11:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I've given you advice. Please carefully reread Verifiability, not truth. --Yamla (talk) 11:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello, I'm That Tired Tarantula. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to The Thing (1982 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. That Tired Tarantula  Burrow  08:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi there! I sincerely regret such behaviour as well as the actions of those I know. They suggested that if I tell you that it was someone else, you probably won't believe me, but I reasoned that I've already told my friends not to do it in the past. I sincerely regret for their rudeness, and since I like contributing to Wikipedia (not vandalising), I understand that if we continue in this manner, we may receive an IP ban. However, I respectfully ask that you refrain from IP banning us for the benefit of other users on this IP. I will make every effort to prevent this from happening in the future and to stop the vandalism in person.
 * Although I think the threat to "consider your next words carefully" was a bit excessive, I still really appreciate your patience. Thank you very much. Just keep in mind that you're essentially working with juveniles here, who are attempting to be silly in order to make fun of the moderator's actions and the modifications they can make. Not to mention to brag about being "banned from Wikipedia". I'll attempt to visit the website more frequently to see if anything similar occurs again so that I can respond to you appropriately the next time. 109.132.104.178 (talk) 09:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)