User talk:109.150.249.135

October 2011
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Spartacus has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Spartacus, you may be blocked from editing. Read WP:ERA. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Spartacus, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

"BC unconnected to Christianty"...?
How is "Before Christ" unconnected to Christianity? Ian.thomson (talk) 20:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Spartacus. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)