User talk:109.155.160.5

October 2018
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed content from Malcolm Glazer without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:36, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Consumption of Tide Pods, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:34, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

VEB Arena
Hi. Curious as to why you reverted my edit on VEB Arena. I think the first sentence in the history section can be written more clearly. It makes sense as it is currently written but is not by any means perfect. Happy to hear your suggestions. Central Midfielder (talk) 21:41, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Malcolm Glazer, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:05, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Ishak Belfodil. DerDFB (talk) 10:00, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Spelling
Hello. Why did you make these edits, in which you changed the spelling from the right one to the wrong one? Best wishes DBaK (talk) 23:13, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:48, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Good evening again. So, the blind reverts continue, regardless of my merits or approaches: 1 - Adrien Rabiot is currently not with the French team, and most likely he'll never be again as long as Didier Deschamps is the manager; 2 - Nolito: here, i'll humour you as i did in Cristhian Stuani four months ago, but i'll pipe ALL the clubs and not only the ones you want (again, my question: what's the logic of piping some clubs and leaving others unpiped). Maybe you will allow it to stay this time...

Also, per this message (please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Central_Midfielder&diff=862472729&oldid=859582463), it is clear you can be gregarious and polite when/if needed. But not with me, no, i only merit to be reverted and that's it apparently!

Have a good day --Quite A Character (talk) 20:13, 9 October 2018 (UTC)