User talk:109.155.214.163

"Please discuss before changing"
Don't remove the note, do as the note directs, and check the archives first.  Acroterion   (talk)   21:41, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * That wasn't nearly enough time to read the very extensive archived discussions: don't ignore notes like that, and don't edit-war to remove them. I've semi-protected the article to allow enough time for you to do the reading and to achieve a new consensus.  Acroterion   (talk)   21:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

3RR information
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:44, 31 July 2018 (UTC)