User talk:109.156.194.92

Your recent edits
Look, I know that we like to use color satellite images in the main infobox for tropical cyclone articles, but can you please stop adding those images? They look a lot worse than the older images used. Natural color (or near-natural) satellite images are ideal, not the ones that you're using right now. Examples of some good images are those used at Hurricane Linda (1997), Hurricane Michael, and 1999 Odisha cyclone. Thank you.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 08:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

About the images
I’ll argue your point. Some images do look more acceptable with false colour, but for some storms in the 80s or 90s that are pixilated or have no image at all, it’s looks out of date. With the colour images it’s best to freshen things up a bit.
 * Yes, but the images you provided look too washed out, not to mention that the contrast is unappealing. It's better to stick to older images, at least until we can get higher quality, color images.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 10:38, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Where can we get better quality pictures?
 * Well, it depends. You can do a quick Google search for NASA's satellite images. NASA's EOSDIS Worldview is a great source for satellite imagery (if you can manage with the snapshot and download functions). It's one of my favorite sources, though obviously it doesn't have everything, and the satellite images only go back to 2000, currently. Searching up known satellite imagery databases is one of the best ways to go. There are a number of editors who are much more experienced than I am in digging up great satellite images, such as Meow, TheAustinMan, FleurDeOdile, and Hurricane Noah. You can ask any of them if you like.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 13:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC)