User talk:109.158.70.191

This person makes disruptive edits as a part of edit war.

March 2021
Hello, I'm Ahmetlii. I noticed that in this edit to Arshi Khan, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ahmetlii (talk) 14:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi I am explaining over here as well the entertainment Ki Raat is a talk show and we only add those who were participating in the show like Asha Negi, Ravi Dubey and Dipika Kakar not guests as per WP:Filmography and for the other two they are not reliable sources as per Suggested sources book my show and other is not in here. I have left the only one as it has a reliable source

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rubina Dilaik, you may be blocked from editing.    EGL 1234 08:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Winner winner winner
Hi, regarding Rubina Dilaik's content, can I get an explanation of why you are choosing to include contestant with the winner? Articles you are providing in the edit summary aren't going to justify your stance. Fizconiz (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Yes it does stop getting personal with me when you know that i am right. I have given examples of how the tables work they were better before you came onto it. When a celebrity participate in a reality show it is called a contestant. They are called contestant and when they win the winner or runner up part goes in the notes section. Stop inviting edit wars all the time and thinking you are right when you are not. Plus Stop making everything a problem.


 * A) Edit wars occur when there are consecutive reverts of an edit that you are doing. And something you already did, by your previous warnings. And, the next time you engage in an edit war, I will report you because it's disruptive editing.
 * B) False accusation will get you blocked as they are harassment
 * C) You aren't right as your ignorant guidance on articles that you think is correct aren't going to justify that you're right
 * D) You are the one making the article look bad as you fail to understand simple stuff
 * E) You aren't someone who decides what is right or what is wrong so clear your misconception.
 * F) And, the time I will stop making everything a problem is when I will start seeing less editors like you
 * Lastly, refer to some dictionary on what "getting personal" means. And while you're at it, see what "contestant" means. Either prove to me that contestant and winner should be included, but if you can't in a timely manner, too bad, I will remove it. Fizconiz (talk) 21:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Actually, you might be right. The winner could be included in the notes section if an editor wants to. But, you still should learn what "getting personal" means. Fizconiz (talk) 21:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok sorry for the personal means but it is called contestant when a celebrity is in a reality show it is said there so don’t remove it. And the winner needs to be in.

Look in google and you will get ur answer it said 'a person who takes part in a contest or competition.' and Bigg boss and reality show is a competition. I am sorry for saying I am right but Also you should stop thinking you are right I never make a page look bad making things right by following the rules here.

I never start a edit war if you see your history most of the time you have started one with many users including admins.

And again looking at what personal attack means which is not allowed here I looked at google dictionary and it said 'An abusive remark on or relating to somebody's person instead of providing evidence when examining another person's claims or comments' which you have done to me right now and other users. My guidance is not ignorance at all so don’t remove it as I have told you why we add contestant in.

I'm glad that you searched it. And what you gathered 'a person who takes part in a contest or competition.' was exactly what I was trying to say. I am puzzled when people think I start an edit war. Consecutive reverts for no reason are edit wars, not discussions. Please be aware that these aren't personal attacks and the definition you provided does not reflect my actions. Anyways, I'm happy we reached a consensus. Have a great rest of your day/night. Fizconiz (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

I don’t understand if you knew what a contestant is and a reality show is a competition that why remove it and start a problem for no reason???

Rubina Dilaik
Hi there, you and the other involved editors should be discussing the Rubina Dilaik image selection issue at Talk:Rubina Dilaik. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:58, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thanks for this.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:30, 27 March 2021 (UTC) 

ForAkshan2
Please stop posting to ForAkshan2's talk page. It's really starting to look like harassment to me. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.