User talk:109.173.156.226

March 2022
Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Return 0, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 00:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Waterworks (Better Call Saul), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 13:52, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Waterworks (Better Call Saul), you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Where is a citation for information that Watersports are critically acclaimed? My extended sentence for it being "one of the best episodes" are practically all over internet. 109.173.156.226 (talk) 15:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The citation for "critically acclaimed" is in the "Critical response" section of the article. That does not include "one of the best episodes". Read WP:V: "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." And read WP:RS; your claiming that something is "all over the internet" is not considered a reliable source. If it's all over the internet, you should have no difficulty finding and citing a reliable source instead of expecting others to do it for you. The warning stands. Don't add unsourced information again. Sundayclose (talk) 16:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Interstellar (film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 04:40, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm M.Bitton. An edit that you recently made to PKN Orlen seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! M.Bitton (talk) 22:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Connor's Wedding, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)