User talk:109.175.69.115

November 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Denmark in World War II, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:48, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is nothing original in what was added to the article. That addition explains the very first line of the next section, which refers to the vastly increased money supply. The disputed section is common knowledge, added for the sake of context, especially so that people who do not know much of the topic can better understand it.

Well, now I added a footnote, one of the already existing references used on the page, which contains the common knowledge I had added. A waste of time, but should leave everybody happy.