User talk:109.239.222.103

October 2018
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Goguryeo‎. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. ''Whatever the substance of your dispute is with Vif12vf, these sort of abusive edit summaries are absolutely unacceptable. They also open the question of whether you're really here to contribute constructively or just to cause problems.'' —C.Fred (talk) 02:31, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * You are defending a Korean Nazi prohibiting even discussing a real-life phenomenon. This is your Wikipedia this is a means of misinformation and propaganda of Nazi theories. Which should be prohibited and you are all brought to criminal responsibility.

You let the privileged users of the Nazis to break the rules.

Encourage the rollback of pages even Talk where the phenomenon should be discussed. As well as the rollback of templates with the demand of authoritative sources and indicating that the source is not of high quality, since there are no grounds for saying it. NPOV does not exist on Wikipedia.


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Your Nazi popaganda means blocking discussions and blocking templates.

Proof of absence is not possible, for the reason that it is redundant.

To prove the presence of the phenomenon is obliged to those who declare it.

If you defend Nazi theories without evidence, then the Wikipedia administration refuses to stop such crimes from criminals. And it is insignificant what the rules you have invented say. Criminal legislation is above the rules of the community.

The Korean theory of Bohai is a Nazi theory. Borders of Bohai are scientifically confirmed much less than in Wikipedia. And there are maps on Wikipedia taken from Nazi theories. If the administration of Wikipedia protects their use, then it is an accomplice of a criminal offense.

So far, I'm talking to you anonymously and for good. Do not understand will start the process of bringing to criminal responsibility for complicity.

This is not a personal claim. This is a criminal offense. Which no one has the right to commit.

In addition, I hope you will appreciate the real-world blocking of Wikipedia in a number of countries for the propaganda of Nazi theories.109.239.222.103 (talk) 03:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * If you wish to discuss why these articles should be edited to comply with Wikipedia policies, you are welcome to do so. However, you need to confine the discussion to Wikipedia policies and on-Wikipedia remedies.


 * Calling certain edits a "criminal offense" has a chilling effect on discussion and falls within the scope of a legal threat.


 * You really need to retract that portion of the statement, and you must not make any further comments that imply possible legal actions or ramifications. —C.Fred (talk) 03:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)