User talk:109.246.20.82

October 2017
Hello, I'm Sakura Cartelet. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on David A. Kolb, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Sak ura Cart elet  Talk 01:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm Dr Greg. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Prestatyn, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Dr Greg  talk 03:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018
No mention of 9/11 anywhere in the entire list of assassinations? Surely Urban Moving Systems left a FEW breadcrumbs for you IDIOTS to pick up on....

April 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joshua Kimmich. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Steve-O— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 11:46, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Steve-O. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 12:25, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Steve-O, you may be blocked from editing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:26, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Shellwood (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Shellwood - the truth is not vandalism.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Steve-O. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:32, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Spencer T• C 12:33, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, I'm Path slopu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of administrative divisions of Greater China by Human Development Index— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  PA TH  SL OP U  09:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at British cuisine, you may be blocked from editing.  Calidum   12:38, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Before you defining this as "Disruptive editing" and "vandalization", can tell me the reason why you undid one of my recent normal edits and prevented me from contributing to Wikipedia? Isn't your behaviour disruptive and unconstructive in the first instance? First of all, I have to tell you that no one else outside of the English speaking countries would like to recognize that the UK has a rich culinary culture or so-called tradition in the first instance at all, especially compared to the countries which have rich culinary cultures like France, Italy, Japan and China. Meanwhile, this statement has no reliable evidence to support and is completely subjective, so why I couldn't put the tag of citation needed and a template of POV after the sentence I suspected which is wrong and not neutral? or just simply change the content to what many people might think it is right? And my edits just got reverted three times without any discussion or any reasons that make sense. I really appreciate that you guys have the nerve to send this to me rather than figure out the problem of the article itself.109.246.20.82 (talk) 13:19, 27 July 2019 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.