User talk:109.252.27.171

May 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Coolock, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Thanks for some interesting points and other actions. As they broadly improved the article, including layout, I will look into them when I have time, but to help, if you have any sources you can quote for these data, that would be a big help. We accept newspapers, books, academic papers and other sources, and they don't have to be online. Thanks! SeoR (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. It was very disappointing to see all my edits (not one of which I thought was dubious or controversial) just wiped out. And I don't really understand the problem, supporting books or articles could be found over time, and I have seen many points in many articles with no stated source. I understand that I should not just re-submit them but if I can help in some way to get them accepted, I'm visiting from time to time.